NĀSTIKA DARŚANA
NĀSTIKA DARŚANA (नास्तिक दर्शन)
Nāstika Darśanas are those schools of philosophy which do not accept the authority of the Vedas. In post Vedic times, the Varṇa (वर्ण) system of categorizing the society on the basis of one’s skill and expertise in action, morphed into categorization by social rank and thereby by birth. This discrimination led to questioning of the concepts and doctrines propagated by the Vedas and Nāstika schools of philosophy emerged. Nāstika in this context does not mean non-believer in God. There are three main Nāstika Darśanas – Cārvāka, Jainism and Buddhism.
Cārvāka (चार्वाक)
Cārvāka, also known as Lokāyata (लोकायत), is one of the Nāstika Darśanas that is characterized as materialistic and atheistic as it propounds materialism, philosophical skepticism and religious indifference. The other name of this ancient Indian atheistic school is Bārhaspatya Darśana (बार्हस्पत्य दर्शन). Maitrāyaṇopaniṣad (मैत्रायणोपनिषद्) says that when the demons (Asura (असुर)) approached Bṛhaspati (बृहस्पति) for advice on Ātman (आत्मन्), Bṛhaspati, the Guru (गुरु) of the Deva (देव), purposely misguided them by teaching this materialistic or Lokāyata doctrine which later came to be known as the Cārvāka philosophy. Chāndogyopaniṣad (छान्दोग्योपनिषद्) also mentions that Bṛhaspati preached this to the Asuras. The answer to the question, as to why Bṛhaspati misguided them could be that he wanted the Asuras, devoid of faith in the truth, to become despondent of their misconduct. Then, through dejection, they would turn their attention towards jñāna (ज्ञान).
The complete version of this Darśana, with all the Sūtras (सूत्र), is not available. Yet, based upon whatever material is currently available, and the opponent’s deliberations upon the quotes, one can get a reasonably good idea about it.
There is mention of Cārvāka’s philosophy in Kauṭilya’s Arthaśāstra (कौटिल्य अर्थशास्त्र) where it is counted along with Sāṅkhya (सांख्य) and Yoga (योग) as a logical science (Ānvīkṣikī or आन्वीक्षिकी). This Darśana believes that the lone source of knowledge is ‘perception through senses’, an approach similar to the modern Western philosophical school ‘Logical positivism’ of Wittgenstein. Other testimonial means of knowledge like inference, authority etc., are not acceptable to this school. Lokāyata darśana needs proof to accept a concept as valid. It encourages doubt and fosters critical reasoning required for any scientific enquiry or logical thinking.
This darśana is not merely an atheistic school like the Buddhist darśana, but it strongly opposes the concept of dharma (धर्म), which most other schools of Indian philosophy accept and hold essential and valid for a meaningful human life. This school believes in three main principles. Epistemologically, since it considers direct perception (pratyakṣa pramāṇa (प्रत्यक्ष प्रमाण)) as the only valid means of knowledge, one can derive these principles easily. They are:
- The Ultimate Reality consists of the Mahābhūta (महाभूत) – pṛthvī (पृथ्वी) – solid, Jala (जल) – liquid, Agni (अग्नि) – energy, and Vāyu (वायु) – air (gaseous existence of matter). It rarely accepts Ākāśa (आकाश) or plasma/ether as the fundamental element. Obviously, therefore, it believes that everything ends up in matter and thus only matter is the reality.
- All phenomena and events are a result of the physical laws of nature, and the inspirational power or consciousness is a characteristic of matter just like any other characteristic of matter, under naturalism or svabhāvavāda (स्वभाववाद). In this context, the often-quoted couplet is
So long as (one is) alive (one should) live happily; take loan, but drink ghee (milk-fat, a common item in Indian food). Once body is consumed to ashes (who knows), when will one come back in this world.
Nevertheless, Cārvākas did not advocate merely a materialistic theory of happiness, they were insistent on the life with a moral fabric, they did think of truth and untruth. However, since happiness too has limitations, and if one limits knowledge only to perception, the concepts of truth and untruth lose their meaningful context.
- Ātman or the entity ‘which cognizes’, does not have an independent existence.
Some modern scholars hold that no proper justice has been done to Cārvākas’ doctrines. In the backdrop of lack of proper research work it is fair to say that Cārvākas have not been properly studied. Indeed, very scanty material is available but we think, further studies should be conducted to repeal the prevailing mist around Cārvāka doctrines.
Jainism
Jainism or Jain Dharma (जैन धर्म) or Jain Darśana (जैन दर्शन) is believed to be one of the oldest indigenous religions of India. Jain philosophical thought is ancient. It possibly emerged after 400 to 500 years after Vedic period. It is categorised as one of the Nāstika Darśana as it does not acknowledge the authority of the Vedas. Jainism advocates disciplined nonviolence as a means to attain spiritual purity and enlightenment, through Śramaṇa paramparā (श्रमण परम्परा). Śramaṇa paramparā is a system that believes in liberating Jīva (जीव) or conscious being from the cycle of rebirths by freeing it from its encrustation of accumulated karmas (कर्म) by practicing rigorous austerity. It believes in adhering to the path of victory or Jain in order to cross over the stream of lives.
Jainism does not believe in Īśvara (ईश्वर) – God, but believes in Tīrthaṅkara (तीर्थङ्कर), the Siddha (सिद्ध), Arhat (अर्हत्). All these epithets denote the attributes of real sage or Sādhu (साधु). These sages have shown the path of liberation. According to Jain hierarchy there were twenty-four such sages who are called as Tīrthaṅkaras. The last amongst them was Lord Mahāvira (महावीर) (599 BCE). Lord Ādinātha Ṛṣabhadeva (आदिनाथ ऋषभदेव) was the first Tīrthaṅkara, who, perhaps existed 4-5 centuries after the Vedic period. It also means that fundamental concepts of Jainism had begun to emerge shortly after or during the Vedic era. Pārśvanātha (पार्श्वनाथ) (749 BCE) and Mahāvira (599 – 527 BCE) were the last two Tīrthaṅkaras. Mahāvira was contemporary to Lord Buddha. Most of the earlier Jain religious and philosophical works, approximately enumerated as 85, were written in Ardhamāgadhī (अर्धमागधी) and Prākṝta (प्राकृत). The later Jain religious treatises were written in Sanskrit also.
Śvetāmbara (श्वेताम्बर) and the Digambara (दिगम्बर) are the two pantha (पंथ) or sects in Jainism. Both the sects advocate adhering to the fixed canonical laws. There are no fundamental or in-depth differences in terms of the philosophical doctrines between these two sects. However, the Śvetāmbaras believe in the validity and sacredness of canonical literature, that is, the twelve Aṅga (अङ्ग) and Sūtras, as they exist now. The Digambaras hold that the original and genuine texts of the verbatim teachings of Lord Mahāvira were lost long ago. They believe that the available literature was memorized and then reproduced.
Atheism in Jainism
Jain thought is primarily against assuming that universe is a result of some action (caused by God as creator) and holds that the world continues to be eternally in existence. If one has to assume a causer-creator God, why should we assume somebody like a human being who is imperfect or why should one assume only one person as a creator? If we assume many, then what if there is a difference of opinion amongst them? In addition, we must then assume that such a cause has a will power, but such a will cannot exist without passion and change of nature, and thus God will then turn out to be passionate and changing; the characteristics, which are inconsistent with the concept of God.
Second question is why should God create the world? If the universe is just a sport of God, why do we find good organization, happiness at one end, and on the other, so much of misery in the world? If the universe is a sport, it is worthless to presume existence of such a God, who is interested in a purposeless action. Since not all such objections seem plausible and consistent, Jain thought prefers not to presume the existence of controversial causer-creator. One can presume that on the basis of substance or dravya (द्रव्य) (Jīva and Ajīva (अजीव)) and the eternal action, the existence of phenomenal world can be satisfactorily explained. Hence, Jainism does not find it necessary to assume existence of God. Although this notion outwardly looks similar to that of Sāṅkhya school, it primarily centres on making opponents speechless, rather than analyze and deliberate on the opposite views and fundamentals.
Principles of Jainism
The original philosophical thought of Jainism is pluralist or Anekāntavāda (अनेकान्तवाद or the doctrine of pluralistic reality), and solely believes in non-violence (Ahiṁsā (अहिंसा)).
Anekāntavāda or the Doctrine of Pluralistic Reality
Our knowledge of matter is usually limited, because matter has a number of characteristics, whereas we end up in understanding of some of such characteristics. Nayavāda (नयवाद) in Jain philosophy means knowledge of matter as experienced by the knower. Syādvāda (स्याद्वाद) means, that although we know matter in many modes, each substance does have an unchanging element at its root, despite this, we only know it, in some mode or the other that is limited; hence, our knowledge of matter is always incomplete. As a result, we only know its probable existence. This particular concept of ‘existence in some ways (the most probable)’ is implied in the word, Syāt (स्यात्). These are broadly the arguments of the pluralist approach about existence of matter.
Nayavāda has two types, dravya-naya (द्रव्य-नय) and paryāya-naya (पर्याय-नय):
- Dravya-naya means knowledge of matter keeping in view its fundamental unchanging element. Here too there are three sub-types: naigama-naya (नैगम-नय) which is general not specific, saṅgraha-naya (संग्रह-नय) which keeps in view the common characteristic amongst all, and vyavahāra-naya (व्यवहार-नय) where one lays emphasis on a particular aspect of matter.
- Paryāya-naya means knowledge of matter considering the probable alternative modes that one perceives, which too have four categories- Ṛjusūtranaya (ऋजुसूत्रनय), considering momentary state of a thing and the rest categories, which lay more emphasis on knowledge of a thing from point of language, they are: śabda- naya (शब्द-नय), samabhirūdha-naya (समभिरूध-नय), and evambhūta-naya (एवम्भूत-नय).
As matter is perceived in many nayas, it would be incorrect to ascribe importance to a particular naya.
Syādvāda or Saptabhaṅginaya (सप्तभङ्गिनय) or the theory of the relativity of knowledge, involves seven dialectical steps:
- Syād asti (स्याद् अस्ति) or a thing is real
- Syān nāsti (स्यान् नास्ति) or a thing is unreal
- Syād asti ca nāsti ca (स्याद् अस्ति च नास्ति च) or relatively, a thing is both real and unreal
- Syād avaktavyaḥ (स्याद् अवक्तव्यः) or relatively a thing is indescribable
- Syād asti cāvaktavyaḥ (स्याद् अस्ति चावक्तव्यः) or relatively a thing is real and is indescribable
- Syān nāsti cāvaktavyaḥ (स्यान् नास्ति चावक्तव्यः) or relatively a thing is unreal and indescribable
- Syād asti ca nāsti cāvaktavyaḥ (स्याद् अस्ति च नास्ति चावक्तव्यः) or relatively a thing is real, unreal, and indescribable.
Ahiṁsā (अहिंसा)
The core principle of Jain philosophy is Non-violence (Ahiṁsā). Jainism prescribes five Mahavratas (महाव्रत) or vows:
- Ahiṁsā or non-injury
- Satya (सत्य) or truth in thought, word and deed
- Asteya (अस्तेय) or non-stealing in thought, word and deed
- Brahmacharya (ब्रह्मचर्य) or abstaining from self-indulgence of thought, speech and action
- Aparigraha (अपरिग्रह) or abstinence from possessing worldly goods.
By the way of leading such austere life, Jainism aims at purging of all karma and releasing the Jīva from the cycle of birth and death (Mokṣa (मोक्ष))
Buddhism
Buddhism is one of the Nāstika Darśana as it does not acknowledge the authority of the Vedas. However, it stays silent on the existence of God.
Gautama Buddha (गौतम बुद्ध) (563-483 B.C.), under whose name, Buddhism was established, is perhaps one of the few examples of the chosen ones who made great sacrifices for the betterment, welfare, and upliftment of humanity. Born in a royal family, where all worldly delights and things of pleasure and happiness were easily available, Gautama Buddha at just twenty-nine years of age, left the palace one night, renouncing his kingdom, wealth, his beautiful wife and a lovely child and set out in the quest of the Ultimate Truth. His solitary goal was to seek the path of freedom to liberate humanity from misery and sufferings. He lived a long eighty years and strived to fulfil his life mission.
The source of Buddhist Philosophy chiefly comes from the three canonical works, called Tripiṭakas (त्रिपिटक). They were written in Pālī (पाली) and are said to contain Buddha’s thoughts and views. They are:
- Vinayapiṭaka (विनयपिटक) – deals with the rules of Saṅgha (संघ)
- Suttapiṭaka (सुत्तपिटक) – deals with Buddha’s sermons and dialogues
- Abhidhammapiṭaka (अभिधम्मपिटक)- contains expositions of Philosophical theories
Different Sects of Buddhism
Common belief is that Buddha founded Buddhism during his lifetime. But the fact is that after his known first preaching at Sāranāth (सारनाथ) at Vārāṇasī (वाराणसी), he seldom preached publicly about his principles. It was only about 100 years after his death, two groups of the believers in Buddha precepts split and Buddhism came into being as a formal religion, with two different sects, since its commencement itself.
The two sects are known as
- Hīnayāna (हीनयान), the lower vehicle and
- Mahāyāna (महायान), the higher vehicle
The believers belonging to the sect which insisted on adhering to Buddha’s preaching verbatim were Hīnayānis. They were orthodox and interpreted Buddha’s preaching about attaining nirvāṇa (निर्वाण) or liberation by moral conduct and meditation. The Hīnayāna nomenclature was given to them by the other sect, which was known as Mahāyāna, the higher vehicle. Mahāyānis accepted wider meaning of Buddha’s sermons.
The Hīnayāna sect spread over the South Asian regions, like India, Sri Lanka, Indonesia, Myanmar, Thailand etc. The Mahāyāna sect spread over the northern part of Asia, like Afghanistan, China, Japan, Mongolia, Korea, etc. Mahāyāna interpreted Buddha’s thoughts through local concepts and absorbed the local religious customs and traditions. According to the Mahāyāna sect Buddha himself was God.
Four different sects emerged after 400 years of Buddha’s passing away. The fourfold classification of Buddha philosophy is based upon two chief questions, one metaphysical or concerning reality and the other epistemological or concerning the knowledge of reality.
From Hīnayāna sect emerged yet two other sects:
- Sautrāntika (सौत्रान्तिक)
- Vaibhāṣika (वैभाषिक)
Both are realistic and believe that the external world does exist absolutely. Sautrāntikas hold that external objects are not perceived but known by inference (anumāna (अनुमान)). Vaibhāṣikas, hold that the external world is directly perceived (pratyakṣa pramāṇa or प्रत्यक्ष प्रमाण).
From Mahāyāna sect emerged two sects
- Yogācāra (योगाचार) or Vijñānavāda (विज्ञानवाद)
- Mādhyamaka (माध्यमक)
Both these sects are idealistic in their approach which has also been called as ethical idealism. Both support the concept of Buddhist Anātmavāda (अनात्मवाद) or non-existence of soul and present the outer universe indifferently. In Yogācāra, the contention is that the existence of the outer objective universe is void of reality (vijñānamaya (विज्ञानमय)). This concept of vijñānamayatā (विज्ञानमयता) is also expressed in typical term ‘Tathatā (तथता)’ or ‘as it is’. This concept can be partly comparable with the “Ding an sich” or “thing in itself” propagated by famous German thinker Immanuel Kant. Mādhyamaka sect believes that the objective universe is svabhāvarahita (स्वभावरहित) or “without its own state or nature” meaning thereby that all is void Śūnya (शून्य) or cipher (zero). Founder of Mādhyamaka philosophy is Nāgārjuna (नागार्जुन).
In Buddhist principles two pramāṇas or means of comprehension or knowledge have been accepted. They are perception or pratyakṣa and inference or anumāna.
In Mādhyamaka śūnyavāda (शून्यवाद) it is assumed that substance does not have its own state of being, it is without its own nature, despite this its existence is not denied. According to this thought the spiritual or metaphysical absolute Ātman (आत्मन्) or ‘Being’ is like a start-up point and not abhāva (अभाव) or ‘non-existence’. According to Mādhyamaka school this ‘absolute being’ is beyond words. It is Prajñāpāramitā (प्रज्ञापारमिता) or ‘such-ness’. This is almost comparable with Vedāntika (वेदान्तिक) expression ‘neti neti’ (नेति नेति). This concept can also be expressed, in typical Mādhyamaka sect canon, as perceptible world or saṁvṛtisatya (संवृतिसत्य). Saṁvṛti (संवृति) means ‘accepted by each and everybody.’ This can also be compared with Vedāntika expression vyāvahārika sattā (व्यावहारिक सत्ता). Buddhist concept of nirvāṇa is like Vedāntika Mokṣa. This can be attained only through renouncing Tṛṣṇā (तृष्णा) or thirst or desire, which is like Vedāntika concept of Niṣkāma karma (निष्काम कर्म).
Principles of Buddhism
In Buddhism emphasis is laid on the eradication of human misery and suffering, which became the central theme of Buddhism founded in the later years. Lord Buddha seldom participated in any kind of theological, moral, or even theoretical debates on serious matters related with highly philosophical genre. He addressed such matters as Avyākṛta (अव्याकृत) (or undefined). In his first religious sermons in the Dharmacakrapravartana (धर्मचक्रप्रवर्तन) conference held at Sāranāth, Buddha formulated main philosophical principles, which, eventually became formal canonical order.
These principles or doctrines are also known as four Noble Truths (Āryasatya (आर्यसत्य)) or chief elements. They are:
- Duḥkha (दुःख) or Suffering: Life invariably leads to suffering.
- Duḥkhasamudaya (दुःखसमुदय) or the origin or cause of suffering:. The cause for suffering is craving or Āsakti (आसक्ति). This craving for things or events in reality is a delusion.
- Duḥkhanirodha (दुःखनिरोध) or cessation of suffering: Suffering has a reason or cause, so try and eradicate the cause and suffering will cease to exist. This state leads to enlightenment or Bodhi (बोधि).
- Duḥkhanīvaraṇa – Āṣṭāṅgamārga (दुःखनिवारण- अष्टाङ्गमार्ग) or the eight-fold path to liberation: Eradication of suffering can be achieved through the eight-fold path, which is advocated for attainment of nirvāṇa:
- Samyak-dṛṣṭi (सम्यक्-दृष्टि) or appropriate understanding
- Samyak-saṅkalpa (सम्यक्-सङ्कल्प) or appropriate resolve
- Samyak-vāc (सम्यक्-वाच्) or appropriate speech
- Samyak-karma (सम्यक्-कर्म) or appropriate action
- Samyak-ājīvikā (सम्यक्-आजीविका) or appropriate means of livelihood
- Samyak-vyāyāma (सम्यक्-व्यायाम) or appropriate volition or efforts
- Samyak-smṛti (सम्यक्-स्मृति) or appropriate memory or mindfulness
- Samyak-samādhi (सम्यक्-समाधि) or appropriate concentration leading to proper meditation.
The three famous refuges which are to be sworn by the believer in Buddhism are:
- Buddham śaraṇaṃ gacchāmi (बुद्धं शरणं गच्छामि) (I take refuge of Lord Buddha)
- Dhammam śaraṇaṃ gacchāmi (धम्मम् शरणं गच्छामि) (I take refuge of righteousness or Dharma (धर्म))
- Saṅgham śaraṇaṃ gacchāmi (संघं शरणं गच्छामि) (I take refuge of the concept of togetherness)
Refuge (Śaraṇam (शरणं)) is a place one goes to find peace, security, and safety. The Buddhist considers continual rebirth in saṁsāra (संसार) or the world to be an unenviable prospect and believes the Buddha, the Dhamma, and the Saṅgha to be a refuge from this. Thus, the Buddha, Dhamma and Saṅgha are often called the Three Refuges. The Buddha is a refuge in that his enlightenment demonstrates that saṁsāra can be transcended, the Dhamma is a refuge in that it shows how enlightenment can be attained and the Saṅgha is a refuge in that it offers the guidance, encouragement, example and support needed to transcend saṁsāra.
Other important teachings
In addition to eradication of human suffering as main principle, all the Buddhist sects consider some common principles:
- Sarvam nityam (सर्वं नित्यं) or sarvam kṣaṇikam (सर्वं क्षणिकं): According to this sub-principle everything in the universe lasts for a moment only. Action and change make every existence significant and relevant. In absence of change and action, there is no existence. Hence, everything is momentary (kṣaṇabhaṅgura or क्षणभंगुर). Nothing is permanent.
- Sarvam duḥkham (सर्वं दुःखं): According to this the whole being is pervaded by suffering.
- Sarvam anātmam (सर्वं अनात्मम्): This sub-principle advocates that everything is bereft of Ātman. Here the word anātmam is loaded and denotes an unchangeable dravya or entity. In this there is belief in rebirth, yet here rebirth means a wave generating another wave.
- Sarvam tathātmam (सर्वं तथात्मं): meaning thereby everything is as it is. Each and every substance cannot be described in terms of form. According to Buddhist philosophy, substance is śunya or point of setting off.
- Nirvāṇam śāntam (निर्वाणं शान्तं): According to this one reaches a state of a being where mundane things such as greed, desire, thirst etc., do not exist, it is an ultimate state or nirvāṇa which is attained by an Arhat (अर्हत्) or Buddha. Attaining this state of existence is the final goal and purpose of human life.
Conditioned or interdependent arising
Pratītyasamutpāda (प्रतीत्यसमुत्पाद) means conditioned or interdependent arising. This is a Buddhist canonical concept, which leads to understanding the cause-effect relationship of various events happening in the universe. This theory is in contradiction with Vedantic ātmavādī (आत्मवादी) concept, which advocates that a change is caused in something which already exists. According to Buddhist thought there exists the doctrine which posits that every mental and physical aspect emerge and exist due to conditionality or presence of certain conditions. Those aspects cease to exist once those conditions are no more there. The concept of cycle of suffering and rebirth stands explained by this principle.
Buddhism is more of a philosophy and a humanistic way of life which can be summed up as a striving to lead a moral life, being aware of one’s thoughts and actions and developing wisdom, compassion and understanding.

