Philosophy or Darśana
INDIAN PHILOSOPHY: BHĀRATĪYA DARŚANAŚĀSTRA (भारतीय दर्शनशास्त्र)
The word Darśana (दर्शन) means to perceive through contemplation. It is derived from the Sanskrit root ‘dṛś’ (दृश्), which means to see – prekṣaṇam (प्रेक्षणम्). In the present context this root denotes valid experience. It enquires into the nature of universe in which we live, the nature of human soul and its destiny, and the nature of God or the Supreme Being and their relation to one another. This root indicates towards a specific experience or cognition which can be addressed as actual or real visual perception.
Many of the philosophers in ancient Indian knowledge systems had the scientific outlook. They were trying to find answers to questions like: Who am I? Why do I exist? What is this universe? Who created it? What is the relationship between the Creator and the Created? What is the relationship between me and the Universe and the Creator? Indian civilization and ancient Indian knowledge systems developed a great deal and reached their acme during the Vedic era.
Due to the advent of some non-vedic schools of thought, such as, Buddhism, Jainism, Lokāyata (लोकायत) and some other tantric systems, a conflict between Vedic and non-Vedic concepts became unavoidable in the post Buddhist India. As a revolting answer to this crisis, the ancient Indians began to advocate Vedic view through Vedic schools of philosophy namely Sāṅkhya (सांख्य), Yoga (योग), Nyāya (न्याय), Vaiśeṣika (वैशेषिक), Mīmāṁsā (मीमांसा) and Vedānta (वेदांत). These schools came to be known as Āstika Darśana (आस्तिक दर्शन). Thus, a new trend emerged which sought the use of rational knowledge, from the ancient texts, for explaining the human nature and to uplift the moral and spiritual powers of human beings.
Evolution of Indian Philosophy
The roots of the doctrines discussed in the Darśanaśāstra or philosophy are embedded in the Vedic literature. Inherent in the Vedic Saṁhitās (संहिता) is the concept of one Supreme Being – the Brahman, also known as Caitanya (चैतन्य) or Consciousness or Ultimate Reality, which is the essence of Indian philosophical knowledge system.
Subsequent to Āraṇyaka (आरण्यक) and Upaniṣadic period followed the Sūtra (सूत्र) Period (800 BCE to 100 CE). Prime literature on Darśanas emerged in the form of sūtras. This marked the beginning of systematic writing and structuring of the treatises of various schools of philosophy. A sūtra-work consists of a collection of brief statements or aphorisms, which only briefly hinted at basic doctrines. Hence elaborate, interpretative commentaries (Ṭīkā or टीका and Bhāṣya or भाष्य) were written, which explained and elaborated the precepts of the sūtras. This led to questions, counter questions and objections, and possible replies. These played a major role in explaining and development of the philosophical doctrines. There emerged a tradition of commentaries upon commentaries , and additional independent works were written which assumed the character of sub-schools.These commentaries included works of some of the greatest Indian commentators , including Śaṅkara (शङ्कर), Kumārila Bhaṭṭa (कुमारिल भट्ट), Śrīdhara (श्रीधर), Rāmānuja (रामानुज), Mādhava (माधव), Vallabha (वल्लभ), Vācaspati (वाचस्पति), Udayana (उदयन) , Bhāskara (भास्कर), Jayanta (जयन्त), Vijñānabhikṣu (विज्ञानभिक्षु), Raghunātha (रघुनाथ), to name a few.
This led to the formal rise of concepts of different philosophies known as Darśanaśāstra. There emerged two systems in the form of ‘Āstika’ and ‘Nāstika’ (नास्तिक) Darśana.
Concepts in Indian Philosophy
The systems of philosophy in India did not emerge merely out of the speculations of the human mind. They arose as a result of deeper craving for realization of the spiritual purpose of human life. Ancient Indian seers and scholars believed that one can know all the secrets and mysteries of the universe once one has known his own self properly. Ātmānaṃ viddhi (आत्मानं विद्धि) or ‘Know Thyself’ has ever been the Vedantic dictum. After having known one’s own self one should endeavour to launch the quest for Ultimate Reality. The ultimate goal is to become one with the Supreme Brahman (ब्रह्मन्) by way of establishing Advaita (अद्वैत) or non-duality, and then proceeding on the path of Mokṣa (मोक्ष) or Salvation.
Besides the concepts of Advaita and Mokṣa as the ultimate goal of life, the Indian philosophical contemplation centres around the following concepts:
1. Brahmāṇḍotpatti Siddhānta (ब्रह्मांडोत्पत्ति सिद्धांत) or Cosmogony –
Cosmogony refers to the study of the origin of the cosmos or the reality itself. According to the Sāṅkhya system of Vedic cosmogony, Mahābhūta (महाभूत) or physical quantities (Earth, Water, Fire, Air, Plasma or Ether) are created through the Pañcīkaraṇa kriyā (पंचीकरण क्रिया) (causing any one thing to contain all the five elements) as the consequence of the imbalance in the guṇa (गुण) or qualities. There are three guṇas of Prakṛti (प्रकृति).
- Sattvaguṇa (सत्त्वगुण) -quality of goodness;
- Rajoguṇa (रजोगुण) – quality or tendency that promotes motion and action. It also represents courage;
- Tamoguṇa (तमोगुण) – it causes inertia. It is of an indifferent nature. It represents darkness or dullness. It serves to restrain certain activities or actions.
The successive states of creation follow the path of state of maximum or excess of sattvaguṇa to the maximum or excess of tamoguṇa. This process is also known as guṇotkarṣavāda (गुणोत्कर्षवाद).
2. Brahmāṇḍavijñāna (ब्रह्मांडविज्ञान) or Cosmology –
In Vedānta philosophy the sequence of creation or cosmology is as explained in the Taittirīyopaniṣad (तैत्तिरीयोपनिषद्).
– Taittirīyopaniṣad, Brahmananda Valli (ब्रह्मानन्द वल्लि).
This is the Self, the soul or Ātman (आत्मन्), which is cosmic consciousness or Brahman. From the Ātman or Brahman ether or plasma was born; from ether, air; and from the air, fire; from the fire, the waters and from the waters, the earth; from the earth, herbs and plants; and from the herbs and plants, food; and from the food, man was born.
3. Īśvara -vichāra (ईश्वर विचार) – thoughts on the Creator of the Universe –
Almighty God, whether god exists or not? In most of the schools of philosophy Īśvara or God is the centre of wide-ranging discussions. Some of the schools of philosophy, such as Sāṅkhya and Buddhism have kept mum on this, whereas Cārvāka school has unequivocally refuted the existence of God.
Discussion on existence of God include Nirguṇa (निर्गुण) and Saguṇa (सगुण) attributes of Brahman. Nirguṇa means without guṇa or attributes, and Saguṇa means with guṇas or attributes.
4. Ātman and Brahman:
These two aspects are the crux of Indian philosophical contemplation. Brāhma (ब्राह्म) means ‘word’ or speech and also that which manifests, blossoms forth, creates or bursts forth. From this developed the unique concept of Brahman as the transcendental reality or consciousness.
5. Means of attaining the goal of life.
Purposeful life can be lived under the system of Varṇāśrama Dharma (वर्णाश्रम धर्म):
- Varṇa (वर्ण) or Social Divisions – Consistent with the basic premise, the human society was guided to live like a cohesive social system – Samāja Puruṣa (समाज पुरुष). The Varṇas constituted – Brāhmaṇa (ब्राह्मण) who functioned as priests, teachers, and intellectuals, Kṣatriya (क्षत्रिय) functioned as police, army, and administration, Vaiśya (वैश्य) were farmers, merchants, and business people, Śūdra (शूद्र) acted as artisans and workers. Here it is important to mention that the Varṇa system was designed based on one’s skill and expertise in action, i.e. Guṇakarma (गुणकर्म).
- Āśrama (आश्रम) or Stages of Life – Four āśramas guided a person as to how to lead his individual life. These āśramas were brahmacaryāśrama (ब्रह्मचर्याश्रम), gṛhasthāśrama (गृहस्थाश्रम), vānaprasthāśrama (वानप्रस्थाश्रम) and sannyāsāśrama (संन्यासाश्रम). In the context of these four āśramas, four puruṣārthas (पुरुषार्थ) or the goals/aims of human life have also been discussed. These puruṣārtha guided man about what needs to be achieved, so that his actions become consistent with the ultimate aim of attainment of Mokṣa.
Meaning of “Philosophy”
One aspect of Dārśanika (दार्शनिक) learning has to be born in mind. Even in Indian context, the expression Darśanaśāstra is not as intelligible to the modern learners or commoners as the word philosophy is. In the wake of this it will be only relevant to discuss the expression “philosophy”. Etymologically the term philosophy is derived from the Greek term fileosophia, which means love of wisdom. If we abide by this interpretation, all those who are interested in having concrete knowledge of reality are called philosophers as they are seeking wisdom in their respective fields. This helps us to identify philosophy with science. What is called Science now was known as Natural philosophy at one time. However, there are many interpretations of philosophy. Some interpret philosophy as world outlook, for some philosophy is a universal science. Some philosophers try to make a sharp distinction between science and philosophy by asserting that philosophy aims at understanding, whereas science aims at explaining. Details on this aspect can be seen in the segment of Western Wisdom in this website.
Classification of Indian Philosophy/Darśanas
Ancient Indians had the gift of intuition along with intellect. With the help of their analytical prowess powered by intuition and instinct they were able to develop different schools of philosophy or Darśana. All these schools of philosophy developed in the periods around 600 BCE to 100 CE. Various Darśanas are grouped into two types:
- Āstika Darśana – are those which recognize the authority of Vedas – Veda prāmāṇya (वेद प्रामाण्य).
- Nāstika Darśana – are those which do not accept the authority of the Vedas.
General misconception prevails that categorization of schools of philosophy as Āstika and Nāstika Darśanas are based on whether the composer Āchārya (आचार्य) of a particular Darśana believed in God or not. However, it is important to understand here that such categorization is based on whether the Āchārya accepted the authority of Vedas or not.





